So I was listening to this lecture about developmental psychology, and the lecturer was talking about the experiments they were doing with young children. Every once in a while she would go back and compare the performance of the children to that of monkeys. Now, I am not sure who should be insulted, but I am fairly sure someone should. There seems to be a good case for the kids since the research equates their mental capacity to that of a monkey. The monkeys on the other hand also seem to have a strong case as no one seems to try and challenge babies with climbing a tree or living with Jane Goodall.
You hear stuff like monkeys can do this , monkeys can do that all the time, and I would always say it sounds interesting…sounds interesting, But is it really? Is it interesting? Its not like there's some actual work we are planning on having monkeys perform, right? Its not that we can gain some deep and meaningful understanding of life, the universe and everything by having monkeys perform these weird tasks.
Now, this sort of thing presumably took quite a bit of work to get to, you sometimes have to live with the monkeys or train them to perform or understand certain rules, and you have to do controls…very hard work. And its not just limited to monkeys, there's the whole story with Skinner and his pigeons, rats and mazes, and generally speaking a whole lot of experiments involving animals performing all kinds of strange tasks.
So I had to ask myself,"why?" , "why go to all this trouble?" ,why would anyone spend all this time and money to show that a monkey has the mental capacity of a two year old? And then it hit me – why does Jay Leno ask random pedestrian to locate
Sure, mocking people isn’t "nice", its entertaining, but its not nice. Still, must we mock the monkeys?
So please, if there's one thing you take from this post, let it be that "Prison Break" stopped making sense once they broke out of prison.

0 comments:
Post a Comment